Mean Business

Spurious claims and psychological injury

December 8, 2011
15 Comments

You might like to check out my responses to a recent article in The Weekend Australian Magazine (Nov 26-27) that dealt with the issue of workplace bullying (see also previous posts).

My article is published in The Conversation, and highlights that we need to talk not only about false claims, but real claims, and non-reported claims, and that we need to be more aware of what constitutes a psychological injury.

Be great to have your feedback on this!

 


Is it ok to say you’re not ok?

September 15, 2011
2 Comments

Today is RUOK? day  – a national day of action aimed at suicide prevention. It challenges people to start a conversation with friends, colleagues, and anyone else with whom they come into contact regarding mental health issues, by asking early and stopping small issues from becoming big ones. Any activity aimed at suicide prevention and mental health awareness is a good one. RUOK day has gone from small beginnings to garnering huge celebrity endorsement. Workplaces are challenged to become involved in several ways, through meetings, raising awareness, and more practical/physical events. You can see the resources offered to support the day at the RUOK? day website. 

Care has been taken to ensure there are resources available for people who may not be feeling ok, and for those who are starting conversations. It can only be hoped that these skills can permeate workplaces and our society so that it’s not just a one-day, tokenistic thing, but “normalises” how we think about  getting help for mental health issues (ie. that getting help for mental health is no different to getting help for, say,  a sore foot).

But the cynic in me can see some organisations “ticking off” that they have dealt with mental health problems at work by supporting RUOK day. As noble as RUOK day is, however, it’s good intentions can be frustrated in a number of ways.

Perhaps a real situation will help illustrate some of the potential problems.

I was in a workplace situation some time ago where a supervisor had acted in ways that I considered to be grossly inappropriate, compromising to the organisation, and which disregarded the efforts I had made. To put it simply, I felt disrespected.  That I had told the supervisor about the inappropriateness of their actions put me in a somewhat vulnerable position, and my annoyance was palpable. I was in a cafe with a group of colleagues when the supervisor walked up from behind me, put his hand lightly on my shoulder and asked “Are you ok?”.

How do you think I responded:

a. No I’m not ok.
b. No I’m not ok because you did this and that and it was grossly inappropriate and disrespectful…
c. Yes, I’m fine.

Of course I said “Yes, I’m fine”. What else could I say? There were colleagues around, and the question wasn’t really aimed at resolving the problem – just resolving that person’s uncomfortableness with the situation (making them feel ok). Granted, this wasn’t a situation of mental health issues – I wasn’t depressed, or suicidal, or showing any other signs of mental health problems – but this situation demonstrates some of the problems of asking “RUOK?” unthinkingly.

First, the environment wasn’t right. Don’t ask people this in an environment where others are present.

Second, the question wasn’t the right one. It’s too easy just to say “yes I’m fine”. If you’re going to start such conversations, they need to be conversations. The RUOK day website has some resources about this. Consider  the language used – asking “You’re fine aren’t you” assumes that the person is, and its even harder to say “no”.

Third, the wrong person asked the question. There was no way I could say that I was very annoyed to the person who had caused the problem. There are also issues with workplace hierarchies that can impact on this.

Forth, what would the person have done if I had said, “No, I’m not ok”? Were they prepared for that answer? What would have happened next? In the situation above it would have been confrontational, but the point for mental health awareness is that you need to be prepared that someone could say “No, I’m not ok”. Again, the RUOK day website has resources for this, but not everyone who engages in such a conversation will have read it. Starting a conversation is one thing. But conversation starters have to be prepared.

In some ways I think it would be better to encourage the perception that it’s ok to report when things are not ok (be it at work, or other contexts), rather than to focus on the question, or the questioner. Many people this RUOK day will simply not feel safe reporting a mental health issue at work, for fear of stigmatisation, or that they’ll be placed on the watch list. While this continues, asking the question won’t have the optimal effect. I’m often reminded that workplace bullying and psychological hazards at work are affected by the same attitudes and biases that we have for mental health in general, and we need to continue to break these down.

We have to start somewhere – and starting a conversation is a good place to start. But we need to ensure follow up, change our workplace cultures so that it’s safe to report,  demonstrate to people that it is safe, and then have adequate support available to them when they do.


Inappropriate calls about bullying

August 3, 2011
6 Comments

An interesting article appeared last week reporting on the number of phone calls Worksafe Victoria has received in the last 12 months involving workplace bullying. There were 6000. Read the article here from The Age July 24, 2011.

6000 seems staggering, but the article goes on to highlight that only 10% of those (600) were referred to the bullying response unit. Of those 600, 1 in 10 (ie. 60 in total) were investigated by an inspector (gee it’s not easy when they switch from % to frequencies is it!).

Several reasons were given for the lack of investigation, including that people are claiming workplace bullying when it is clearly not workplace bullying. This really is a big issue – despite the guidance material that is now available in every state, people are still not clear on when it’s appropriate or inappropriate to claim bullying. Granted, sometimes the situation is unclear, but some of the situations quoted in the article, really don’t warrant a claim of bullying:

A Construction worker was involved in a physical altercation with his supervisor after a discussion about poor work performance. The supervisor suffered facial injuries and the complainant was sacked on the spot. Worker alleged his termination was bullying and unfair because the manager deserved a punch in the face.

A Retail worker was caught by their manager stealing money from the till, and was sacked and reported to police. The complainant admitted theft, but said being sacked and reported to police was bullying.

These are both cases where even from the limited information we have, it’s likely we could conclude that it was probably not workplace bullying.

But let’s “devil’s advocate” this other case that was offered. What other information might you want to know  in order to assess this situation? Perhaps we can discuss this through comments?

A local government employee (the complainant) entered a shared lunch area with two other employees. She claimed the employees’ supervisor passed by and greeted her colleagues but not her. Alleged that the supervisor was trying to isolate and exclude her.

The real issue raised by this article is why don’t people yet know how to correctly identify workplace bullying, given the amount of information that is now out there, and readily available, to help them to do so. I think the answer could be two-fold. First, people are not well trained (if at all) in workplace bullying awareness. It tends to be a one hour training session powerpoint bilge (yes, I hate those).
Second, people are not always trained or made aware that they need to make an assessment before taking a claim further.
Claims that inaccurately invoke bullying can be dangerous, both for the individuals involved (they reduce your credibility!), and in terms of their effects on legitimate complaints.
We should also remember that even though 6000 calls were made, and many of them were not bullying, it’s likely that a large number of legitimate cases are out there and not being reported at all.
I guess part of the purpose of this article was for Worksafe Victoria to be able to communicate to the employees that they need to think before claiming bullying. It’s another reminder that this awareness journey that we’re on is a long one, and far from over.

    About this blog

    This blog is about all the bad stuff that goes on at work, with a focus on workplace bullying and other unacceptable behaviours that are a risk to people's health and safety

    Preventing Workplace Bullying; Caponecchia & Wyatt (2011)

    Preventing Workplace Bullying: An evidence based guide for managers and employees

    Click for info on our book

    Categories

    Archives

    Search

    Blog Stats

    • 6,281 hits

    Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 370 other subscribers

    Hits map